Proposal to adjust the mod philosophy

Vladovlak · 23 days ago

Hello. I agree that using coal to smelt iron ore into iron is not realistic. But blatantly replacing iron with steel in all recipes was a mistake. It was enough to add alternative recipes with steel to those with iron. The mod itself would not be damaged. The game would be enriched with new possibilities. This is the only reason why I have to temporarily stop using your mod.

Let me know what you decide. I'll respect it.

Hoochie Hoochie · 23 days ago

+1
I also stopped using the mod a while ago because adding it to an existing save is problematic—it disrupts the production chain—and I didn't really enjoy playing without the familiar iron chain.
Ideally, it would be great to give the user a choice regarding which version to play; for instance, a parameter could be added to the config file to select the production chain. Depending on that setting, the game could allow either just "steel" or both "iron" and "steel."

👍 1
Vladovlak · 23 days ago

Hoochie wrote:

+1
I also stopped using the mod a while ago because adding it to an existing save is problematic—it disrupts the production chain—and I didn't really enjoy playing without the familiar iron chain.
Ideally, it would be great to give the user a choice regarding which version to play; for instance, a parameter could be added to the config file to select the production chain. Depending on that setting, the game could allow either just "steel" or both "iron" and "steel."

That's a good idea.

37 Showing 1–3 of 3